|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cebar Homepage |
History
of CEBAR |
Education for Girls |
Schools of Chichicastenango | The Teacher Resource Center | The Happy Smiles Program |
|
Even very young daughters in traditional Maya families have always played a critical role in family survival strategies by performing housekeeping chores, providing care for younger siblings, and producing and selling products in essential household businesses. In recent years, however, girls have become even more important. For while Maya culture – especially in more isolated rural areas – often puts a disproportionately high subjective value on male offspring, changing economic realities have diminished the possibilities for sons to participate fully in the family economic endeavor.
Meanwhile, even families with enough land to substantially assist family survival have experienced increasing reliance on the commercial activity of women. For while the “Green Revolution” of the fifties and sixties substantially increased harvest yields, it also mandated regular large investments in fertilizers and pesticides across the growing season. Since alternative organic methods of cultivation have not yet gained wide acceptance in the Guatemalan Highlands, the expense of chemicals or purchased organic fertilizers continues to be necessary. At the same time, real income in the altiplano remains abysmally low, with a minimum wage of well under U.S. $6 per day and an actual rate of daily remuneration of less than $5 (in summer of 2005, depending on number of hours and whether lunch is served, 40 quetzales, or about $5, was considered an excellent wage) if and when work could actually be found. Therefore, men have few viable options for accumulating the investment needed for the only accepted agricultural technology, meaning – again – that income generated by women and girls is even more critical than was the case only a few years ago. Given
their importance to the family economy, it might be assumed girls would
now be enjoying increasing autonomy and self-actualization within rural
Maya societies. But although certain [not always desirable]
elements of “western culture” have wedged their way into rural Maya
society, in some respects Maya women remain unfortunately limited not only
by ‘new’ changing economic realities, but by ‘old’ sociocultural
and economic pressures.
In
the Chichicastenango area, where CEBAR has granted 240 scholarships to
girls and women (plus another 15 o4 so to 'special case boys), for example,
teachers in remote schools with whom we have talked uniformly estimate that 10 to 15 percent of young rural
girls never attend school at all. Five
reasons are often cited to explain failure to enroll. In a more
or less generally accepted ranking of importance, teachers say: 1) the poorest families cannot meet the minimal costs
of enrolling offspring in public school; 2) anecdotal evidence suggests
that more rural families (up to at least 15 percent in some remote
cantones, or hamlets, say teachers) are migrating to the south coast for
the sugar harvest, meaning that the enrollment period and first several
weeks of school are missed; 3) parents who can’t speak Spanish
at all are reticent to deal with school officials who don’t speak the
native Maya K’iche’ language and, in a related sense; 4) because
astronomical failure rates for children who do not speak Spanish make dedication of scarce family resources to education
too risky (about
60 percent of teachers in Chichi speak little or no K’iche’);
and
5) because many parents, for often quite valid if very sad reasons, simply do
understand education as a good investment,
especially for girls. But
while failure to enroll is a huge problem in itself, an even greater
problem is that the rate of early school deserción
– dropout – is tragically high. Within
the municipality, for various cultural, familial, linguistic, and
administrative reasons, the annual failure rate through the second grade
runs between 35 and 50 percent in rural schools.
Failures –
and especially repeated failures – induce a high
level of frustration and shame on the part of both students and their
families, and only about 50 percent of girls in Chichi’s 70 or so public
primary schools complete the third grade.
If they do complete the third grade, the attrition rate improves,
with some 80 percent of graduating third graders going on to pass the
sixth grade and become eligible for junior high.
Because of late starts, multiple failures, and year long dropouts
along the way, meanwhile, very few girls finish primary school before they
are 14 years old, while the average is closer to 16 years old.
There
is, first, that in Chichicastenango, simple geography represents a
huge impediment. The
municipality is not simply a little town, but 400 square kilometers of
rough mountain terrain, cut through with deep gorges.
This vast area is dotted with some 85 ‘cantones,’
or hamlets, connected only by primitive, easily eroded roads.
Pickup “taxis” ply the roads closest to the pueblo with
relative frequency, but in more remote cantones only occasional or no
public transportation passes by. In
any event, for the vast majority of families, even low-cost pickup
transport is a moot point, since daily payment of fares is out of reach.
And while almost all hamlets have their own state-supported school,
as of academic year 2005 (academic years run January through October) there are only
10 junior high schools serving the rural communities, most of which are
'cooperative' – meaning that parents and local improvement committees must bear the cost
of founding and building the school, and proving to the State for several
years that the institute is a valid operational educational institute,
before the government begins to share an appreciable share of salaries and
maintenance. Not only are
rural basicos few and far between as well as impoverished and woefully
under-equipped, however, but most are also clustered in the wealthier
cantones – generally meaning those closest to the three highways that
pass through the huge municipality. Thus,
both students and their very low-paid teachers are faced with long and
difficult daily hikes up and down mountains and across deep and dangerous
paths through the gorges to get to school. Second,
especially given that most Chichicastecas are well into their teens and
able to take an important role in the family economy before they finish
sixth grade, heightened family pressure makes many young women reticent to
push the issue in the face of resistance from their elders .
Meanwhile, studies indicate that most girls who continue their
education beyond the basic Spanish literacy level receive very little
financial or moral support from their famiies, making academic success yet
more difficult.
This is especially true because in economic terms junior high
studies mean sharply higher financial costs as well as a greater loss of opportunity to make
money. With only one exception, for instance, junior high
schools charge a monthly tuition as well as much higher “inscription” or
enrollment costs (the 'exception' is a state-run vocational school that does not charge monthly tuition, but high costs of tools and study
materials more than offset the difference.
Furthermore, that particular school is low capacity and admission
is granted only by lottery, meaning most applicants cannot gain entry even
if they can afford the overall high cost). Junior
high attendance, therefore, is more often than not a profound financial
hardship on even families who claim relative economic stability, and
requires a sincere commitment of time and energy and economic resources by
both the student and her family
As already noted, things are changing at a very slow pace. Still, however, according to our own studies in Chichicastenango, which so far closely match a recent UN study of academic participation by rural Maya girls and women, only 5 percent of Chichicastenango’s young women make it through the front door of a junior high school, and only about 1 percent make it to diversificado, or high school, of any sort. As to university studies, meanwhile, many of Chichi’s 85 cantones have never yet sent one of their own – either male or female – to college, while others have sent only one or two of their young men, while yet a few others currently have their first young woman enrolled.
1)
Alejandra, from Chucám, attends
Anunciata Catholic School, even though she is from an evangelical
family. CEBAR cofounders Max Kintner & Mary Pliska first met
María five years ago, and gave her the nickname 'gatita,' or kitten,
because of the way she shyly and silently followed them around, never
asking for anything but sometimes being rewarded with a trinket, taco, or
little bag of french fries for sheer persistence. Now in her third
year as a 'becada,' she is neither shy nor silent, but a fun-loving girl
and a very successful student. She continues to work hard at the
market, meanwhile, toting merchandise on her back through the gorge that
separates the Pueblo of Chichi and the canton of Chucám, and treading the
street each market day to pester tourists into buying the 'dream dolls,'
ceramic necklaces, or
other trinkets she peddles. (return
to photo) |
|
|
|
Last Revised 4 August 2005 |